open:wp4:wp4techforum3:hackathon
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
open:wp4:wp4techforum3:hackathon [2017/03/23 16:16] louys |
open:wp4:wp4techforum3:hackathon [2017/04/13 11:23] (current) genova |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| | MORRIS, Dave - 1) Using Docker - sharing experiences, problems and solutions. 2) Time series data - what data do we have and how do we want to access it. (tuesday afternoon ?) | | | MORRIS, Dave - 1) Using Docker - sharing experiences, problems and solutions. 2) Time series data - what data do we have and how do we want to access it. (tuesday afternoon ?) | | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{open:wp4:docker-20170323.pdf|Summary of the discussion}} | ||
| | **TOPIC: Time Series && Provenance** | | | **TOPIC: Time Series && Provenance** | | ||
| |BONNAREL, François - 1 ) TimeSeries in the VO (actually organized in the Tuesday afternoon) 2 ) Provenance data model (see below) | | |BONNAREL, François - 1 ) TimeSeries in the VO (actually organized in the Tuesday afternoon) 2 ) Provenance data model (see below) | | ||
| - | | Follow up of tuesday, Thursday morning : FB proposal = list metadata and data needed for the different use cases | | + | | Time Domain Follow up of tuesday, Thursday morning : FB proposal = list metadata and data needed for the different use cases | |
| + | |||
| + | {{open:wp4:wp4techforum3:timedomainhackathon.pdf|Summary of the discussion (text)}}, {{open:wp4:timedomainhat.pdf|Summary of the discussion (slides)}} | ||
| | **TOPIC : PROVENANCE** | | | **TOPIC : PROVENANCE** | | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
| - PROV-XML Lofar | - PROV-XML Lofar | ||
| - VOTable Pollux , CDS | - VOTable Pollux , CDS | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ** Jose Enrique RUIZ DEL MAZO, CTA data model ** | ||
| ** Michèle SANGUILLON - voprov python module: current status presentation + discussion ** | ** Michèle SANGUILLON - voprov python module: current status presentation + discussion ** | ||
| Line 43: | Line 50: | ||
| |RIEBE Kristin - F. Bonnarel and ? - Use case discussions: next steps for implementations |discussion| | |RIEBE Kristin - F. Bonnarel and ? - Use case discussions: next steps for implementations |discussion| | ||
| + | |||
| Line 49: | Line 57: | ||
| | ZWOLF, Carlo Maria - Title - Persistent Identifiers: a key component for achieving agile data provenance and reproducibility Starting from a working example (the VAMDC query Store), we will generalise the implemented concepts for sketching an agile method for data provenance and reproducibility.| | | ZWOLF, Carlo Maria - Title - Persistent Identifiers: a key component for achieving agile data provenance and reproducibility Starting from a working example (the VAMDC query Store), we will generalise the implemented concepts for sketching an agile method for data provenance and reproducibility.| | ||
| - | Discussion of RDA activities and of the information provided on the web site. Exchange of experience with those of the participants who had attended a RDA Plenary on the interest of participation. Short presentation by CMZ of the dynamic data citation recommendation. | + | Discussion of RDA activities and of the information provided on the web site. Exchange of experience with those of the participants who had attended a RDA Plenary on the interest of participation. Short presentation by CMZ of implementation the dynamic data citation recommendation (demo at {{https://youtu.be/kDDWFpi22cU}}). |
| | **TOPIC : Intellectual property rights and the VO ** (was: VO SOFTWARE AND THIRD-PARTY LIBRARIES) | | | **TOPIC : Intellectual property rights and the VO ** (was: VO SOFTWARE AND THIRD-PARTY LIBRARIES) | | ||
| Line 79: | Line 87: | ||
| | **TOPIC : IVOA Standard Documents V2.0** | | | **TOPIC : IVOA Standard Documents V2.0** | | ||
| | GENOVA, Françoise - The comments received on the IVOA Standard Documents V2.0 are nearly all taken into account. A decision has to be taken on a few points. It would be useful to seize the opportunity that three of the authors are attending to discuss these points F2F. The discussion is of course open to other people interested if any | | | GENOVA, Françoise - The comments received on the IVOA Standard Documents V2.0 are nearly all taken into account. A decision has to be taken on a few points. It would be useful to seize the opportunity that three of the authors are attending to discuss these points F2F. The discussion is of course open to other people interested if any | | ||
| + | Discussion of and agreement on the pending questions. | ||
| | **TOPIC : starjava build** | | | **TOPIC : starjava build** | | ||
open/wp4/wp4techforum3/hackathon.1490282174.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/03/23 16:16 by louys
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
